Post tenebras lux

Post tenebras lux

Light after darkness

DVD - 2013 | Spanish
Average Rating:
Rate this:
Follows an upscale Mexican family whose move to the countryside in search of an ideal life results in domestic crisis and class friction. An enthralling and enigmatic exploration of the primal conflicts of the human condition.
Publisher: [United States] : Strand Releasing, [2013]
Characteristics: 1 videodisc (115 min.) : sd., col. ; 4 3/4 in.
Alternative Title: Light after darkness


From the critics

Community Activity


Add a Comment
Sep 21, 2018

Slow-moving. Film seems to lean toward a documentary-style detachment. The narrative zigzags back and forth. I may come back to this review.

Nov 03, 2016

Carlos Reygadas’ maddeningly opaque stream of consciousness (the title translates as “After Darkness, Light”) starts out with two toddlers having bad dreams. Little Rut dreams she is surrounded by wild animals and big bad wolves during a doomsday lightning storm—actually farm livestock and dogs but the metaphor is clear. Meanwhile, in the bunk above her, Eleazar dreams of a devil complete with horns, tail, and glowing pink skin sauntering into mom and dad’s room with an ominous toolbox in hand. What follows is a series of ruminations—filmed in the box-like Academy ratio with prismatic visual effects—on the struggle between the dark and the light which focuses on a single middle class family with some serious problems: Rut, Eleazar, and their parents Juan and Natalia. Throughout it all Reygadas struggles to maintain that precarious balance between good and evil, or human kindness vs human foibles if you will, as he highlights the best and the worst in his larger cast of characters amid surreal visions of apocalypse and salvation—a macabre suicide and sanguineous rainstorm on one hand, a sunlit picnic and final embrace played to Neil Young’s “It’s A Dream” on the other. Semi-autobiographical (Rut and Eleazar are actually played by Reygadas’ own kids) and off-putting in its subjectivity (a non-sequitur involving an English boys’ rugby match is thrown in for no other reason that to show that teamwork is a good thing) this is sure to divide audiences despite the fact it netted Reygadas the Best Director award at Cannes. A masterwork of great depth and creativity or the kind of cinematic gobbledygook that wows arthouse crowds too intimidated to question its artistic integrity? Perhaps a more apt title would be "Pop-Corn et Prétention".

Mar 14, 2015

Major work by one of the world's most daring and striking film artists. Should be discussed. Yes, there are many parts that aren't obvious--but a group discussion experience would greatly enhance the take away for all involved.

Mar 13, 2015

Shot in the style of Terrence Malick, this Mexican/European art-house piece is hard for me to understand totally. So many disconnected episodes: the rugby match, the group sex in a bath-house, the geese hunting. I don't known why they were there and what purpose they served. However, if you keep an open mind, this is still a pretty interesting cinematic experience. In Spanish with subtitles.

Jul 15, 2014

Yuck. Waste of time.

Jun 26, 2014

Reygadas is such a bore; he seems to have seen a lot of Malick, a lot of Coen brothers and maybe some Bunuel too. The influences are there but they don't develop into something strong and vital. Avoid.

Apr 11, 2014

This film comes across mostly as some sort of self-indulgent exercise on the part of the director. A collage of visuals that are connected by little if no narrative and while some are beautiful nature scenes, most seem like the product of an amateurish home video, compounded with the irritating effect of the cinematographer using a very narrow lens, causing double images and blurring on the edges of the frames. Ultimately a very tedious exercise to be endured.

Jan 06, 2014

Typical art film - hardly anything happens, and I have no idea what the scenes set in Britain or Ireland are supposed to mean. But many of the scenes are beautiful, although I got tired of the weird lens that blurs the edges. Maybe the steambath brothel scene offended the viewers at Cannes? Time shifts were confusing too, but I was glad to see that the darling children grew up.

btmslt Dec 13, 2013

This was a very tedious, not easily understandable, confusing film which I stopped watching after a short time.


Add Notices
Sep 23, 2017

Sexual Content: Group sex scene; scenes of nudity.


Add Age Suitability

There are no ages for this title yet.


Add a Summary

There are no summaries for this title yet.


Add a Quote

There are no quotes for this title yet.

Explore Further


Subject Headings


Find it at WCCLS

To Top